PEER Information Brief
 
 

Parent Participation
Crucial to School Reform


prepard by Barbara Buswell and Beth Schaffner

Peak Parent Center, Colorado Springs, Colorado


 

"Real change can only come as a result of the commitments of both the hearts and minds of the total school community — teachers, parents, students, dministrators, and school boards."
—Lisa Delpit

Why Participate in General Education Reform Today?

Education reform has become a pressing reality for all communities. Local, state, and federal education agencies have defined desired student outcomes, paid increased attention to the importance of rigorous content and performance standards for students, and discussed ways to hold schools accountable for students learning at higher levels. This focus on improved results has an impact on all students and all schools. One can see reform at work in local efforts that include site-based collaborations of parents, teachers, and administrators, as well as in statewide education reform initiatives.

Common Issues in School Reform

Because of the way general education has traditionally been structured, many people have difficulty understanding how students with disabilities can be included in school reform efforts. They have only experienced traditional techniques and teaching approaches such as lecture with follow-up exercises, curriculum taught primarily through textbooks, or grouping students in tracks based on ability. In addition, as a result of their own personal experiences in school, people frequently have many incorrect or limited perceptions.They may perceive that all students in a classroom must be at the same instructional level, or be able to work at the same rate, or have the same learning objectives in order to participate together in learning activities. These traditional models of instruction still exist, but they do not lend themselves well to addressing the needs of the majority of diverse learners found in classrooms today.

The issue of rights and protections adds further complexity to the question of how students with disabilities fit into school reform. Some people are fearful that if students with disabilities are included in reform, they could lose the special rights and safeguards to which they are entitled under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). Furthermore, they are concerned about whether the general education system can meet anyone’s needs, let alone the needs of students with disabilities.

Parents often experience resistance to their involvement in setting policy for schools. Some barriers are cultural and require customized outreach efforts that take into account the diverse norms and experiences of families. Others, like scheduling meetings at inconvenient times, are organizational and can be addressed in a more general fashion. Families often feel that educational decisions are made by other people who understand the issues better or who have control of the funds necessary for reform. In addition, some families who would like to be involved need access to information to be effective participants. Sometimes, people who have a strong interest in the schools are not informed and thereby are left out of the discussions and the decision-making process.

New Opportunities for Students with Disabilities in School Reform Efforts

Given the current situation, where many schools are achieving less than satisfactory results for students who receive special education services as well as students in general education, it is vital that families and advocates for students who receive special education services take part in school restructuring discussions. All students — not just students traditionally included in general education — need a rich curriculum. However, special education traditionally has focused primarily on the processes of instruction rather than on student results or depth in curriculum. The 1997 Amendments to IDEA confirmed that students with disabilities must have access to the general curriculum as well as access to individualized instructional supports. A second important issue is that students with disabilities are commonly denied access to typical incidental learning opportunities in school. Being part of social activities and rituals of the school community is important for students with disabilities if they are to participate fully in the culture or "informal curriculum" of the school. Students with disabilities need shared learning experiences with non-disabled students to develop social interaction skills and friendships — both critical dimensions of preparation for later life.

A final consideration is that students receiving special education services frequently need strong role models to assist with their language development and problem-solving skills. Access to strong role models is also important for learning appropriate behavior.

Since school reform can provide new opportunities for students with disabilities to experience success in the context of general education, it is important for families to examine how teaching practices being implemented in general education reform can enhance the provision of quality special education support services. By restructuring general education, schools can provide new learning opportunities to address these students’ needs for rich curricula and normalized learning experiences with non-disabled peers while still providing meaningful, individually tailored learning opportunities as designated in each student’s Individualized Education Program.

Tips for Participation in Reform Efforts

Family members, advocates, educators, and students and adults with disabilities bring many different levels of expertise, experience, and energy to restructuring schools to meet students’ needs better. It is important for people who are committed to generating change in their schools to choose strategies that interest and work for them. The suggestions and ideas that follow are intended to serve as "triggers" to give people ideas that they can adapt.

Effectiveness of Combined Efforts

Active involvement of diverse groups, including families, in school reform is essential to promote the development of effective schools in which all students can succeed. Having students (including those with disabilities) participate in these discussions is also highly beneficial. Their presence forces the adoption of genuine reform strategies that will lead to the kinds of changes needed to enable schools to meet the increasingly diverse needs of all learners.

Improved opportunities for all students arise when diverse learning styles, talents, and needs are addressed in the design and development of schools as learning communities. Research has shown that when best practice, instructional strategies, and technologies are designed and used to meet the needs of students with disabilities in general classrooms, all students benefit. Students should have the opportunity to grow up and learn with peers who bring diverse strengths, depth, and richness to the educational experience. Students with disabilities are respected and appreciated for their own unique contributions. As a result, schools improve, and the likelihood is significantly increased that individuals with disabilities in the future will themselves become a part of reform discussions as we work to achieve both excellence and equity in our nation’s educational system.
 
 

Resources on School Reform and Inclusive Education

Following is a bibliography of information about inclusive education and school reform:

A framework for evaluating state and local policies for inclusion. (1996). Consortium on Inclusive Schooling Practices Issue Brief . Alexandria, VA: National State Boards of Education.

Armstrong, T. (1994). Multiple intelligences in the classroom. Alexandria: The Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Bellanca, J. & Swartz, E. (Eds.). (1993). The challenge of detracking. Palantine: IRI/Skylight Publishing, Inc.

Brandt, R. (1993, October). On restructuring roles and relationships: A conversation with Phil Schlechty. Educational Leadership.

Darling-Hammond, Linda, & Falk, B. (1997). Using Standards and Assessment to Support Student Learning. Phi Delta Kappan, 79, 190-202.

Doyle, M.B. (1997) The paraprofessionals’s guide to the inclusive classroom. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.

Eisner, E.W. (1994). Cognition and curriculum reconsidered. New York: Teachers College Press.

Castagnera, E., Fisher, D., Rodifer, K., & Sax, C. (1998) Deciding what to teach and how to teach it. Colorado Springs: PEAK Parent Center, Inc.

Darling-Hammond, L. (1997). The right to learn: A blueprint for creating schools that work. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Delpit, L. (1998). Lessons from Home. Teaching Tolerance, 15-19.

Delpit, L. (1995). Other people’s children. New York: The New Press.

Fisher, D., Pumpian, I., & Sax, C. (in press) Inclusive high schools: Learning from contemporary classrooms. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.

Fullan, M. (1993). Change forces. Bristol, PA: The Falmer Press.

Falvey, M. (1995). Inclusive and heterogeneous schooling. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.

Gardner, H. (1992) The unschooled mind: How children think and how schools should teach. USA: Basic Books.

Goodlad, J. & Lovitt, T. (1993) Integrating general and special education. New York: MacMillan Publishing Co.

Harry, B., Torguson, C., Guerrero, M., & Katkavitch, J. (1993) A posture of reciprocity: Empowering culturally diverse families. Disability and Society, 9 (2), 145-165.

Henderson, A., Marburger, C., & Ooms, T. (1986). Beyond the bake sale. Washington, DC: National Committee for Citizens in Education.

Including Students with Disabilities in Accountability Systems (1998). Consortium on Inclusive Schooling Practices Issue Brief . Pittsburgh, PA: Allegheny University of the Health Sciences.

Jorgensen, C. (1998). Restructuring high schools for all students. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.

Kohn, A. (1996). Beyond discipline: From compliance to community. Alexandria: The Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Kozol, J. (1991). Savage inequalities. New York: Harper Perennial Publishers.

Ladson-Billings, G. (1994). The dreamkeepers. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

Levin, D., Lowe, R., Peterson, B., & Tenorio, R. (Eds.). (1995). Rethinking schools. New York: The New Press.

Lipsky, D. & Gartner, A. (1997). Inclusion and school reform. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.

McGregor, G. & Vogelsberg, R. (1998). Inclusive school practices: Pedagogical and research foundations. Pittsburgh: Allegheny University of the Health Sciences.

Meier, D. (1995). The Power of their ideas. Boston: Beacon Press.

Oakes, J. (1985). Keeping track: How schools structure inequality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Rainforth, B. (1996). Related services supporting inclusion: Congruence of best practices in special education and school reform. Consortium on Inclusive Schooling Practices Issue Brief. Alexandria, VA: National State Boards of Education.

Reigeluth, C.M. (1997). Educational Standards: To standardize or to customize learning. Phi Delta Kappan, 79, 202-206.

Roach, V., Ascroft, J., & Stamp, A. (1995). Winning ways: Creating inclusive schools, classrooms, and communities. Alexandria: National Association of State Boards of Education.

Sapon-Shevin, M. (1998). Because we can change the world: A practical guide for building cooperative inclusive classroom communities. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

Sapon-Shevin, M. (1994). Playing favorites: Gifted education and the disruption of community. New York: State University of New York Press.

Sarason, S. (1995). Parental involvement and the political principle. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

Sax, C., Pumpian, I., & Fisher, D. (1997). Assistive Technology & Inclusion. Consortium on Inclusive Schooling Practices Issue Brief. Pittsburgh, PA: Allegheny University of the Health Sciences.

Schaffner, C.B. & Buswell, B.E. (1997). Inherently Equal: An inclusion action guide for families and educators. Boston: MA: The Federation for Children with Special Needs.

Schaffner, C.B. & Buswell, B.E. (1991). Opening doors: Strategies for including all students in regular education. Colorado Springs: PEAK Parent Center, Inc.

Stainback, S. & Stainback, W. (1996). Inclusion. A guide for educators. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.

Sizer, T. R. (1997). Horace’s hope: What works for the American high school. Somerville, MA: Houghton Mifflin.

Villa, R. & Thousand, J. (Eds.). (1995). Creating an inclusive school. Alexandria: The Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Wheelock, A. (1992). Crossing the tracks: How "untracking" can save America’s schools. New York: The New Press.

Endnotes

1For information on setting up and conducting site visits, see the PEER Information Brief, "Site Visits: Seeing Schools in Action."
 
 

Back to Every Single Student Home

Download this Document in PDF Format

© Copyright 1999
The Federation for Children with Special Needs, Inc.
All Rights Reserved.

This publication has been reviewed and approved by the U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services (OSERS). Funding for this publication was provided by the Office of Special Education Programs, OSERS, U.S. Department of Education, through grant #H029K50208.